WHO Poll
Q: 2023/24 Hopes & aspirations for this season
a. As Champions of Europe there's no reason we shouldn't be pushing for a top 7 spot & a run in the Cups
24%
  
b. Last season was a trophy winning one and there's only one way to go after that, I expect a dull mid table bore fest of a season
17%
  
c. Buy some f***ing players or we're in a battle to stay up & that's as good as it gets
18%
  
d. Moyes out
37%
  
e. New season you say, woohoo time to get the new kit and wear it it to the pub for all the big games, the wags down there call me Mr West Ham
3%
  



GreenStreetPlayer 10:02 Fri Mar 3
Warrant Issued for Snodgrass
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-glasgow-west-39156677

A warrant has been issued for Scotland international footballer Robert Snodgrass after he failed to turn up for his court trial.
The West Ham striker is charged with driving a car while a baby was being held by a passenger.
Snodgrass, 29, is alleged to have driven on Duke Street, Glasgow, on 17 April with too many people to fit a baby seat in.
The baby is alleged to have been in the arms for a rear seat passenger.
Snodgrass, originally from Glasgow, was not at the city's Justice of the Peace Court when the case called.
Defence lawyer Martin Black told the court "he didn't think he had to be" when asked why his client was not present.
The Crown requested a warrant which was granted by JP Eunice Paton.

Replies - Newest Posts First (Show In Chronological Order)

Any Old Iron 4:41 Mon Mar 20
Re: Warrant Issued for Snodgrass
Alex V 7:08 Sat Mar 18

Never thought I'd say this, but agree 100% with you on this.
Snodgrass is the epitome of a bog standard player who is going nowhere. Just why Bilic and DS thought it was worth spending a few £million on such an anonymous performer is a mystery and marks the pair of them down as incompetent.
Instead of aiming high, as Sullivan was claiming he was doing last Summer, this sort of player, suggests that we're settling for bottom half of the Prem.
And £8mill on a 33 year old CB only reinforces the stupidity of our recruitment policy. This is the kind of thing Sullivan should be apologising for.

Lertie Button 11:11 Mon Mar 20
Re: Warrant Issued for Snodgrass
Mistaken identity. Someone thought he was a footballer

1964 1:46 Sun Mar 19
Re: Warrant Issued for Snodgrass
Is it a Search Warrant for someone thats gone missing?

GreenStreetPlayer 1:45 Sun Mar 19
Re: Warrant Issued for Snodgrass
Bilic does seem to be a bit of a tinkerman.

Eddie B 1:43 Sun Mar 19
Re: Warrant Issued for Snodgrass
Why the fuck did Bilic play him on the wrong side of the pitch? He was never going to whip the ball over with his right, and would always going to either have to put it onto his left or give it to Byram.

Terrible decision from Bilic, again.

Athletico Easthamico 9:51 Sat Mar 18
Re: Warrant Issued for Snodgrass
A MOTD highlights player whose best days are gone.

Spandex Sidney 9:38 Sat Mar 18
Re: Warrant Issued for Snodgrass
I'll judge him fully when he has had a run ON THE CORRECT FUCKING SIDE OF THE PITCH

grasshopper 9:38 Sat Mar 18
Re: Warrant Issued for Snodgrass
Snodgrass is showing that he really is a championship quality player, in fact i might even suggest that a league one player is more applicable based on his current form. £10m for him, would have been better spent towards a real right back or striker who apparently weren't available in January, yet somehow Southampton managed to get a proper striker in Gabbaldini.

Sven Roeder 9:38 Sat Mar 18
Re: Warrant Issued for Snodgrass
Sad but true
Was hoping he was a solid Premier League player and at least an upgrade on Euro trash like Tore and Feghouli but he is just depressingly ordinary.
The sort of player who should be playing for Hull or Burnley ... oh that's right he was.
Dreadful today. Didn't think he could be worse than v Chelsea but managed it.

Part of the problem today. Leicester had a solid group who were all 6 out of 10 and above.
And we had at least half a team not worth a place being carried by Lanzini.

Brucies_Star_Prize 9:32 Sat Mar 18
Re: Warrant Issued for Snodgrass

Alex V 7:08 Sat Mar 18

Sad to say, but I think that's a good analysis.

I didn't realise quite how slow he is. Can't beat a man which means his end product has to be spot on to offer any value. He was so predictable today.

claret upstart 8:57 Sat Mar 18
Re: Warrant Issued for Snodgrass
Warrant for impersonating a premier league striker?

Eddie B 8:44 Sat Mar 18
Re: Warrant Issued for Snodgrass
I know he's playing shit but at least put him on the correct side of the pitch.

Hermit Road 8:39 Sat Mar 18
Re: Warrant Issued for Snodgrass
Alex V has hit the nail on the head here.

Willtell 8:31 Sat Mar 18
Re: Warrant Issued for Snodgrass
That's funny as Tony Gale in commentary said that Snodgrass was passing responsibility for the crosses to Byram. Glad you all agree with him....

grasshopper 8:19 Sat Mar 18
Re: Warrant Issued for Snodgrass
Total garbage signing, those who read stats obviously have forgotten how to watch football matches, absolute disaster

Sarge 7:48 Sat Mar 18
Re: Warrant Issued for Snodgrass
Correct toad

Seemed to shirk responsibility

stewie griffin 7:47 Sat Mar 18
Re: Warrant Issued for Snodgrass
He's played almost exclusively on the right for his last 3 clubs. Ffs.


As V says, he's just a bog standard player. Truth is, if you get into a bidding war with Middlesbrough and Burnley for players, you'll end up like Middlesbrough and Burnley. Not rocket science

toadinthehole 7:45 Sat Mar 18
Re: Warrant Issued for Snodgrass
kept giving the ball to Byram, didn't take the initiative

geoffpikey 7:27 Sat Mar 18
Re: Warrant Issued for Snodgrass
Intent to supply crosses? Innocent.

hornchurchsteve 7:09 Sat Mar 18
Re: Warrant Issued for Snodgrass
A shocking signing. Should have saved our money.

Spandex Sidney 7:09 Sat Mar 18
Re: Warrant Issued for Snodgrass
Thrown out on a technicality.

They made him and the jury each stand on the wrong side of the courtroom.

Page 1 - Next




Copyright 2006 WHO.NET | Powered by: